Borna Gojo vs Nathaniel Lammons Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Gojo vs N. Lammons

Borna Gojo

CRO

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

291

C. Rank

595

Best Rank

591

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$669.6K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nathaniel Lammons

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

291

C. Rank

595

Best Rank

591

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$669.6K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Gojo 1 - 0 Lammons

They have played 3 sets in total, with Borna Gojo winning 2 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 1. The last match between Borna Gojo and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Nottingham 1 Challenger, 06-06-2021, Round: Q1, Surface: Grass, with Borna Gojo getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gojo	1
Lammons	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Nottingham 1 Challenger(06-06-21)

Stats

Borna Gojo

Nathaniel Lammons

B. Gojo vs N. Lammons H2H Profile

B. Gojo	Stats	N. Lammons
$669,560	Career Prize Money	$0
58.37% (258-184)	Career Total W/L	53.42% (78-68)
1	Grass	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-5)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Gojo vs N. Lammons Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Borna Gojo has won 44.77% of points on their second serve, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 65.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Borna Gojo, in recent form, has won 44.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.83% and 26.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Borna Gojo has saved 56.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nathaniel Lammons has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Borna Gojo has won 51.35% of matches played (W/L 19/18), with Nathaniel Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Borna Gojo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 122/77), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 10/13). Nathaniel Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Borna Gojo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.89% of matches (W/L 11/8), where as Nathaniel Lammons has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Borna Gojo winning 1 times and Nathaniel Lammons being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Borna Gojo winning 2 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 1.
The last match between Borna Gojo and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Nottingham 1 Challenger, 06-06-2021, Round: Q1, Surface: Grass, with Borna Gojo getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:8.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Borna Gojo has played against opponents with an average rank of 228.78 while Nathaniel Lammons has played against players with an average rank of 867.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Borna Gojo has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Borna Gojo has converted 27.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nathaniel Lammons has converted 50.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Borna Gojo vs Nathaniel Lammons Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Gojo vs N. Lammons H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Gojo	Stats	N. Lammons
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
19	Games Won	17
20	Aces (Total)	7
6	Total Double Faults	0
2:13:8	Average Match Time	2:13:8
70% (87/124)	1st Serve %	66% (71/107)
78% (68/87)	1st Serve Win %	73% (52/71)
51% (19/37)	2nd Serve Win %	64% (23/36)
100% (1/1)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/2)
30% (32/107)	Return Points Win %	30% (37/124)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Gojo Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Sascha Gueymard WayenburgS. Gueymard	L	3-6 7-6(2) 6-4	Stats
Olbia Challenger - 13-10-2025
R2 Martin LandaluceM. Landaluce	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
R1 Francesco FortiF. Forti	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
Roanne Challenger - 06-10-2025
R2 Hugo GastonH. Gaston	L	5-7 7-6(3) 7-5	Stats
R1 Clement ChidekhC. Chidekh	W	6-0 4-6 7-5	Stats

View All

N. Lammons Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Guangzhou Challenger - 08-09-2025
Q1 Tomohiro MasabayashiT. Masabayashi	L	5-7 7-5 1-2 ret.	Stats
Charlottesville Challenger - 01-11-2021
Q1 Gijs BrouwerG. Brouwer	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger - 04-10-2021
Q1 Mats RosenkranzM. Rosenkranz	L	6-4 4-6 7-6(4)	Stats
Szczecin Challenger - 13-09-2021
Q1 Nicola KuhnN. Kuhn	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Nottingham 1 Challenger - 07-06-2021
Q1 Borna GojoB. Gojo	L	7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Gojo vs N. Lammons Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Gojo	Stats	N. Lammons
58.37% (258/184)	YTD Win/Loss	53.42% (78/68)
56.60% (600/460)	Sets Win/Loss	55.46% (188/151)
52.51% (5519/4992)	Games Win/Loss	52.85% (1681/1500)
61.31% (122/77)	Hard Win/Loss	60.24% (50/33)
54.87% (62/51)	Clay Win/Loss	45.45% (10/12)
59.81% (64/43)	Indoor Hard W/L	45.00% (18/22)
43.48% (10/13)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
0.66	Aces Per Game	0.3
3401	Aces Total	463
0.28	Double Faults Per Game	0.15
1433	Total Double Faults	233
1:37:46	Average Match Time	1st Match
438.74	Average Opponent Rank	397.55
62% (19757/31639)	1st Serve %	60% (3350/5549)
74% (14580/19757)	1st Serve Win %	70% (2359/3350)
49% (5864/11882)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (1061/2199)
40% (1085/2705)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (162/401)
37% (11619/31158)	Return Points Win %	35% (1907/5473)
56.25% (18/14)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (7/7)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
60.00% (9/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
48.94% (23/24)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
60.47% (153/100)	Challenger W/L	33.33% (13/26)
59.26% (48/33)	Futures W/L	60.75% (65/42)
58% (252/433)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (78/145)
63% (5/8)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
52% (113/217)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (24/46)
52% (87/168)	Deciding Set Win %	35% (16/46)
82% (261/213)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (83/68)
18% (261/48)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (83/15)
24% (180/43)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (63/11)